The doctor who developed the famous Marshmallow Experiment
has died.
I am sorry for his loss, but all I could really think about
was how much that experiment has bothered me.
The test involved offering a four or five year child old a
single marshmallow immediately or with the caveat that if he or she could put
off eating it for 15 minutes or so, he or she would get a second marshmallow.
I have long accepted that I would have failed that test. It reveals
whether or not a child has self-discipline and predicts success in life.
Now I don't think I am a failure in life, but I know that I
have never been one to delay gratification.
The nuns in my grade school were really into delayed
gratification. They tried their best to
get me to give up goodies, to “offer it up to God” as they put it.
“Don't eat that cookie. Offer it up to God.” I wasn't good
at that. I didn't think God would want my cookie and it would just lie there in
the box, so why give it up?
And Lent? Giving up things like candy and television for six
weeks was really difficult. I would sulk when my mother suggested I eat
something healthy as a snack. “Just have a glass of milk if you’re hungry,” she
would say. Who wants a glass of milk without Oreos to dunk in it?
I always seemed to be hungry after school. After all, hadn’t
I spent the entire day giving things up for God? The recess snack store wasn't
open during Lent and I gave most of my allowance to the Bishops Relief Fund
instead. A few descriptions of starving babies and I gladly gave them my money.
I was fine with it until I opened my lunch box to a peanut butter sandwich and
an apple. Not a cookie in sight.
And thus I failed miserably at giving things up. I began to
see myself as selfish and entirely lacking discipline. Or to put it plainly: a
weakling.
But here is the part I have always wondered about. The famous
test involved marshmallows and I never liked marshmallows.
Marshmallows weren’t worth eating as far as I was concerned.
They were overly sweet and stuck to your teeth and made them hurt. They had a
slightly chalky outer layer so unless they were toasted or floating on top of
hot chocolate I considered them yucky.
I may have been a weakling where goodies were concerned, but
I was a weakling with taste.
So I would have passed the marshmallow test with flying
colors. One now or two later doesn't mean much if you don't like what is being
offered. I am sure I would have said “OK, I’ll wait.” Just because it seemed like
what I was supposed to do. I mean it was obvious that I should wait.
So here’s the real issue: if I had passed the test, would I
have been identified as a child with self-discipline? Would I have believed
it? Would I have seen myself
differently? Would I have given things up with ease during Lent? Would I have
been a favorite of the nuns? "Look at Paula. She is always giving things
up for God.”
Maybe I wouldn't have come home from school every afternoon
with plans to make popcorn and fudge. Maybe I would have done my homework
instead of watching Gunsmoke? Saved
my allowance instead of spending it on goodies?
Would I have stuck with diets? Exercised every day?
Maybe I would have become ambitious.
Would I now be a slimmer person?
Or maybe even rich?
Of course, if they offered me a Reese’s Peanut Butter cup…
Or a slice of your rhubarb pie?
ReplyDeleteYou watched "Gunsmoke" too instead of doing homework?
ReplyDeleteAs for delayed gratification, that only applies to saving the most delicious piece of chocolately candy with the reasberrry filling for last, that is, after you have consumed all the other delicious candies with the other fillings. Alas, I even like marshmallows (chocolate covered, of course)! Guilt not, living is as you point an art.
Marilyn